U.S. President Donald Trump stated that he aims to control Iran’s oil resources amid escalating tensions in the Middle East.
In an interview with the Financial Times on March 29, Trump emphasized that his “preferred option” would be to “take the oil” in Iran, drawing comparisons to previous U.S. efforts to control Venezuela’s oil industry.
Potential Strategy: Seizing Strategic Kharg Island
According to various sources, controlling Iran’s oil could involve targeting Kharg Island—the country’s key oil export hub.
Kharg Island plays a critical role in the global energy supply chain, handling a large share of Iran’s oil exports.
However, experts warn that a military operation there would carry significant risks, including escalation of conflict and high military costs.
U.S. Increases Military Presence in the Middle East
Alongside strong statements, the United States has been deploying additional forces to the Middle East. Thousands of troops, including Marines and elite units, have been sent to reinforce the region.
This move suggests that Washington is preparing for multiple scenarios if tensions continue to escalate.
Diplomatic Efforts Continue
Despite the pressure tactics, President Trump indicated that indirect negotiations between the U.S. and Iran are still progressing.
He has set a timeline for Iran to accept a deal aimed at reducing tensions and suggested that an agreement could be reached in the near term if both sides find common ground.
Impact on Global Energy Markets
Recent statements and military developments have heightened concerns in global energy markets.
Experts warn that if the conflict expands or disrupts key routes such as the Strait of Hormuz—through which around 20% of global oil supply passes—oil prices could become highly volatile.
Indeed, oil prices have already surged amid rising tensions, reflecting fears of a broader energy crisis.
Conclusion
The U.S. President’s statements indicate that energy supply strategies are being seriously considered amid ongoing regional tensions.
However, the actual implementation of such plans will depend heavily on the progress of negotiations and the responses of involved parties in the coming period.
